Search for: "P. v. Hard"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2016, 9:41 am
In Sadoun v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:51 am
[P]olice obtained a warrant to search his home for any computers or other similar devices. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:07 pm
No, they are not, according to the California Supreme Court in Howell v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:50 am
Marshall: Stern v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 11:19 am
I think the Supreme Court might give the Federal Circuit time to work this out.I/P Engine v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am
A dozen years ago I wrote an article about regulating activity on the Internet (‘Solving Legal Issues in Electronic Government: Jurisdiction, Regulation, Governance’, (2002), 1 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology No. 3 p. 1 ) in which I suggested that a number of successful regulatory strategies focused on intermediaries, as the principal targets of regulation might be hard to find or hard to persuade. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:06 pm
Hard to predict how the case will come out. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:50 am
Earlier today, in Bond v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 5:42 pm
(Slip op. at p. 12.) [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:34 pm
A hard-fee cap of $ 1500 simply cannot provide adequate compensation in many cases, including the two cases at issue here. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 2:57 pm
Lake v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:03 am
See Quality Inns Intern., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:24 am
(See Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d at pp. 855–864, 143 Cal.Rptr. 695, 574 P.2d 766; Harding Lawson Associates v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 3:45 am
-->_qacct="p-a5YZ00fCRWn7o";quantserve(); [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:23 pm
Lyle Denniston: “Retired Justice John Paul Stevens, a dissenter to the Supreme Court’s controversial 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
P. 37(b)(2)(C). [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
Lukis v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:03 pm
(Locked In, p. 111.) [read post]
