Search for: "PAUL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 301 - 320 of 807
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Paul Marshall, Bridge Securities, LLC a/k/a/ Bridge Financial, Bridge Equity, Inc., and FOGfuels, Inc.Case number: 13-cv-3032 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia)Case filed: September 11, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 16, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-102 SEC v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
In any event, what he said in his supposed disclaimer was that his prior post was a `complete satire’ and that he was merely engaging `in an exercise of whether free speech still exists in America. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 8:02 am by Elliot Setzer
Elizabeth Threlkeld analyzed the two different deals the United States recently made with the Taliban and the Afghan government. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal DirecTV Says It Will Sever Ties with Far-Right Network One America News MSN – Timothy Bella (Washington Post) | Published: 1/15/2022 DirecTV announced it will sever ties with One America News (OAN) after this year, pulling the conservative news channel from millions of homes. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
6 May 2016, 5:08 am by Amy Howe
The National Immigration Law Center has an explainer on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
It may have a bearing on what is shaping up as the first attempt in Congress to write a new law reacting to the Supreme Court's decision last week in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 11:38 am by Law Lady
  Criminal law -- Aliens -- Reentry into United States after removal or deportation -- Government is collaterally estopped from litigating alienage where jury's verdict of acquittal in prior federal criminal trial for illegal reentry was necessarily based on jury's reasonable doubt about defendant's alienage and fact of alienage status is an essential element of current prosecution for illegal reentry -- Because government is collaterally estopped from arguing… [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 10:23 am by Jordan Brunner
Reuters reports that the United States strongly believes that the killing was ordered by Kim Jong Un. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]