Search for: "Painter v. Painter"
Results 301 - 320
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2014, 6:00 am
Leonard v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:21 am
Here’s a link to the case mentioned earlier, Painter v. [read post]
27 Feb 2021, 5:34 am
Such a provision was part of a commercial painting subcontract in Hate to Paint, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 2:00 am
Painters, plumbers, lawyers, accountants, janitors, life coaches, and similar traditional independent contractors. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 1:12 am
First, I published, in the form of two separate posts (here and here), an interesting exchange between Milberg partner Michael Spencer and Minnesota Law Professor Richard Painter, on the question of the impact of the Morrison v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:57 pm
Painter Fertilizer Co., 73 Fla. 1001, 75 So. 749, 750 (1917); see also Ray-Hof Agencies, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:00 pm
[i] See Puget Sound Painters v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 4:37 pm
Chris Painter doesn't work at CCIPS anymore. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 11:02 am
Trial Lawyers College v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:49 am
This is the backdrop for Barker v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am
Melendez v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:00 am
Melendez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:57 am
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:51 pm
It’s all part of a long-running showdown between the big copyright holders who view the world as divided into creators and consumers, and a coalition of librarians, digital rights groups, disability activists and hackers who seek to preserve a world where people can repurpose, upgrade and build upon the devices and media they legally buy, just as hackers, painters and culture jammers have done for decades before the DMCA. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:04 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
In the case of celebrated painter Mark Rothko’s estate, his children filed suit to remove the estate’s executors, the Marlborough Gallery, for “conspiring to waste the assets of the estate. [read post]
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm
In the case of celebrated painter Mark Rothko’s estate, his children filed suit to remove the estate’s executors, the Marlborough Gallery, for “conspiring to waste the assets of the estate. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Painters, Inc., 634 F.3d 968, 976 (8th Cir. 2011). [read post]
