Search for: "Park v State of New York" Results 301 - 320 of 2,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2012, 6:23 am
Workers’ compensation benefits not available for injuries sustained by an individual in the course of an altercation unrelated to his or her employment  Belaska v New York State Dept. of Law, 2012 NY Slip Op 05046, Appellate Division, Third Department Ann M. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:28 am
An entity not a party to a collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law may not be bound by its termsMatter of Council of School Supervisors & Adm'rs, Local 1 v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2011 NY Slip Op 06451, Appellate Division, First Department The Council filed a contract grievance in response to a city-wide plan applicable to all city agencies that reduced the number of parking permits issued to municipal workers for… [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 10:45 am by Rick St. Hilaire
Kevin Castel yesterday denied Eric Prokopi's motion to dismiss in the case of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 1:27 am
Involvement in an accident going to or from work typically is not job-related for the purposes of receiving workers' compensation benefitsMatter of Littles v New York State Dept. of Corrections, 61 AD3d 1266While en route to her job at a prison, Wandell Littles was injured when she was involved in an automobile accident approximately 10 feet from the entrance to the facility. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 2:35 am by Sheppard Mullin
These wage deduction categories have been narrowly construed by state courts and the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”), and employers are currently prohibited from making deductions for, among other things, gym membership dues, purchases at employer cafeterias, parking passes, or day care expenses. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:05 am by John Hochfelder
New York City Transit Authority (Supreme Court, New York County, 2005) - $1,200,000 for 59 year old woman with humeral neck and head fracture) While there aren’t any cases that the judges failed to mention in Park v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:04 am by msW1Ld
  And as reported in the March 31, 2008 Post, the New York, Michigan and Illinois attorneys general brought an action against Herman Miller in which they alleged that Herman Miller’s resale price maintenance program was a per se violation of their state antitrust laws. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Shaun Marker
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified a question a question on that issue to New York State’s highest appeals court.The case is Georgitsi Realty, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 11:38 am by Patricia Salkin
Arntzen v City of New York, 2022 NY Slip Op 30955(U) (NY Sup Ct NY County 3/23/22). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:04 am by Jeff Welty
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:30 am by Ray Dowd
Television Series, Preemption of Implied In Fact Contract To Sell an Idea, Pitching an Idea, Choice of Law, Conflicts of Law Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:28 am
  And as reported in the March 31, 2009 Post, the state attorneys general of New York, Illinois and Michigan obtained a consent decree against Herman Miller in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for resale price maintenance involving the Aeron chair. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:51 am by Nathan
But New York State, and the City of New York, do it wrong. [read post]