Search for: "Party X v. Party Y"
Results 301 - 320
of 462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(2) In writing or by electronic mail, the names and addresses of all of the third parties that received personal information from the business for the third parties' direct marketing purposes during the preceding calendar year and, if the nature of the third parties' business cannot reasonably be determined from the third parties' name, examples of the products or services marketed, if known to the business, sufficient to give the… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm
Y v Z (Publicity: Sch 1 Proceedings) [2014] EWHC 650 (Fam), [2014] 2 FLR (forthcoming and reported above at p 973) is a judgment on appeal before Bodey J with a rather different factual background, and where the use of material was constrained not by s 98 but by the duty of confidentiality that flows from the duty of full and frank disclosure in financial proceedings. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:20 am
" Then everyone spends the next decade litigating whether X, Y, or Z makes any difference. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 6:44 am
N'est-ce pas aller à l'encontre de ce qui est véhiculé à l'heure actuelle? [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
UPONOR Minn2013http://t.co/T61hjeeHwT -> Joinder in BitTorrent copyright claim ok, TCYK, LLC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:13 am
For example, the correlative of a right is a duty, and if X holds a right against Y, it necessarily follows that Y then owes X a du [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm
“[B]y postponing the division of the pension until it is received, both parties shared the risk [the state employee] would change jobs or die before retiring, which would reduce the pension substantially or forfeit its benefits completely. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:56 am
Ergo, if plaintiff’s shares are currently worth “x”, but defendants’ improper actions caused the shares to lose “y” in value, the could would award plaintiff “x” plus “y”. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
La permission est accordée et l’appel est accueilli en partie. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:55 am
Reynolds v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
Author X, for example, can prohibit a third party, Y, from inscribing a certain pattern of words on Y’s own blank pages with Y’s own ink. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
Bank v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 11:07 am
Here’s the question: “If the state has a law or constitutional amendment that’s saying all legitimate factors must be used in a way to favor party X or party Y, is that lawful? [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:50 pm
Riverside, CA 92506Telephone: (951) = 781-1960 x 204 ? [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:38 am
Typical political claims (e.g., “candidate X is a big-spending liberal” or “candidate Y doesn’t care about our kids as he has voted against school funding increases”) are less likely to be actionable than are claims about the character, integrity, and similar personal qualities of a candidate (e.g., a claim that a candidate did something illegal). [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
X, the social network that used to be known as Twitter, updated its privacy policy to include collection of users’ biometric data. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am
XYPN is a financial planning firm that focuses on advising Generation X and Y clients. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
Gore & Assocs v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:33 pm
Gore & Assocs v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:19 am
(Lucas v. [read post]
