Search for: "Patterson v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 373
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
The Texas Courts and the United States Supreme Court which refuse to grant an emergency stay Thursday sided sided with the State of Texas. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:15 pm
This court case is Southgate Master Fund LLC v United States of America, 06cv2335k, US District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
City of Patterson decision of March 2009, indicates that local inclusionary zoning practices are still subject to controlling state law notwithstanding efforts to characterize such regulations or exactions of housing units as "zoning" or "land use regulation. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 10:56 am
United States Life Ins. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
Danielle Parr, Entertainment Software Association of Canada Anti-circumvention provisions, Canadian piracy of video games is disproportionate to the United States, TPMs used for more than preventing piracy. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:21 am
The parties selected Edward Naythons (“Naythons”), a retired United States Magistrate Judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as the neutral arbitrator. . . . [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
Either way, it appears affordable housing or inclusionary zoning ordinances are under siege in this state (see our blog article on Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Patterson, 128 N.J. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
United States, 543 F.3d 1276 (Fed. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court's 1984 decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 1:15 am
In 1981, in a decision that was hailed by military members and greatly criticized by their former spouses, the Supreme Court of the United States in McCarty v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:46 pm
” The fee finally adopted by the City totaled $20,946 per unit. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:26 am
" Restitution Order Requires Transparent Estimate of LossIn United States v. [read post]
