Search for: "People in Interest of LL"
Results 301 - 320
of 22,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2020, 7:18 am
"Some people ask me, 'Is it possible to over-acknowledge people? [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:42 am
An explanation of how that happens, rather than "I’ll spare you the gruesome details," would be interesting. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:41 pm
Many times I will hear a party say “we’ll just let the judge decide that. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:06 am
My partner Ed Einowski will be speaking about co-location of wind projects with other energy projects, Katie Roek is speaking about offshore wind development on both coasts and the Great Lakes, and I'll be presenting on interesting new issues affecting power purchase agreements. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 11:01 am
We’ll see what happens this week. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:03 am
The article discusses the DOJs concern about a site called, whosarat.com, a site whose link I've not added because I don't want to encourage people to go there...sure, now you can find it easily enough, but you'll have to take that extra step first. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
He'll try to squeeze in some more pro-employee executive orders before he goes to the big speaking circuit.Clear choice: The candidates for President will make their positions on working people very clear. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
FWIW, my answers are: Neither, but if forced to choose, I'll go with the former. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 3:51 am
Is it possible to reconcile these polls: are people interested in supporting human exploration of Mars, but don’t think it’ll lead to anything more? [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:09 am
What I am experiencing is of interest only to people aging as I am, but they already know most of these things. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:14 pm
David and I agree that we would like constitutional rules that would facilitate political bargains between people with different political interests; as David puts it: "if you ensure voters are who they say they are, we'll let you register more of them. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 8:08 pm
And the people want the ability to choose devices.The problem with this approach to the public interest is that it puts gadgets ahead of access. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:18 pm
Moreover, I am interested in how you'd argue the question of harm: does look [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:58 pm
There were a lot of interesting people there and it was great to meet people focusing on sentencing issues from a non-academic perspective who also wanted to hear what academics had to say. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:12 am
I'll just summarize: The Democratic Party doesn't care about low-income people. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 9:14 am
I'll be on what I hope will be a very interesting panel this afternoon starting 3 pm Eastern time, at the Federalist Society Lawyer's Division conference, together with Prof. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:27 am
You’ll have an opportunity to get your party back in 2020.... [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm
I'll explain all of this in detail later. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm
I'll explain all of this in detail later. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 9:14 am
I'll be on what I hope will be a very interesting panel this afternoon starting 3 pm Eastern time, at the Federalist Society Lawyer's Division conference, together with Prof. [read post]
