Search for: "People v Carte"
Results 301 - 320
of 401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
This case was wholly unlike the case of Pieretti v Enfield London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 1104; [2011] PTSR 565 (which held that the section 49A duty complements a housing authority’s duties to the homeless under Part 7 of the Housing Act 1996). [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 8:06 am
Every week, though, approximately ten people die and one-thousand are sent to the emergency department by acetaminophen overdosing. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
It stands to reason that people will do so as well. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:46 am
Case Comment: R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; R (MR (Pakistan)) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (IAC) [2011] UKSC 28 « UKSC blog Family Lore: MK v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
In R (Cart) v Upper Tribunal; R (MR Pakistan) (FC) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) the Supreme Court determined an important question of principle regarding the nature of the relationship between the Upper Tribunal and the High Court, namely the circumstances in which decisions of the Upper Tribunal are open to challenge in judicial review proceedings. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
In last week’s claim (Ryan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Cart v The Upper Tribunal [2011] UKSC 28 (21 June 2011)? [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
Option 1 was rejected as too narrow, leaving the possibility that serious errors of law affecting large numbers of people would go uncorrected. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The USPTO's decision to select e.g. an accounting drawer as starting point prior art seems to a European practitioner to be putting the cart before the horse. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:32 am
Kevin Q. v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am
The opinion, People v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:29 pm
It's at least possible to think that a rational legislator would have wanted each student group to have the latitude to exclude people who are not committed to the group's goals but would not have wanted to give the student groups themselves carte blanche to decide what views count as incompatible with their respective missions. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:57 am
Of course, there are plenty of people who really love legos. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:22 pm
In Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:29 am
This is the 25th anniversary season of the 1986 Mets v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
A lot of work addresses food sales in schools; companies have responsibly agreed not to sell unhealthy products through vending machines and a la carte. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court of California recently upheld the warrantless search of a cell phone text message folder in People v. [read post]
