Search for: "People v David Daniels" Results 301 - 320 of 415
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Add LWOP with financial support (from prison earnings, say) to the family of the victim, and the polls consistently show less than 50 percent.The polls also show that somewhere around two-thirds of the people think we've executed innocent people in the past 5 or 10 years but that roughly two-thirds of them still support the death penalty (again, as an abstract, yes or no question). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
In February 2009, S was convicted in Reading Crown Court for violent offences committed during an unprovoked attack on four people in September 2006. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
The clear answer seems to be Grover Norquist, correctly described by David Brooks as someone who "enforces rigid ultimatums that make governance, or even thinking, impossible. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am by Graeme Hall
Case-law commentaries from across the blogosphere: Duncombe (No. 2) [2011] UKSC 36 Education Law Blog Quader, R (on the application of) v SSHD Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants R (NM) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] The Small Places blog Home Office v Tariq Daniel Barnett’s Employment Law Archive Thamby, R (on the application of) v SSHD – LTTE, nationality, naturalisation and “good character” United Kingdom… [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:55 pm by The Editors
Court of Appeals Second Circuit’s rehearing of Arar v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  Its director Stephen Abell said that the organisation has never been more active or proactive, has high satisfaction rates from the people that use its services and is helping more people than ever before. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The rhetoric-reality gap is attributable in part to a dilemma the Court created for itself: its national policy favoring arbitration is constitutionally-suspect unless people assent, yet letting people make what contracts they wish would prevent implementing the national policy. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am by INFORRM
  At 9.30am, in the case of The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis & anr v Times Newspapers and at 10.00am in the case of Aspion v Daniel. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Joe Touro, Annenberg School: heard rumors that Google is starting to desilo its data: Gmail v. contextual marketing etc. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
While Sotomayor is certainly a role model for people with type-one diabetes, the public coverage could also have at least one negative impact. [read post]