Search for: "People v Greene"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Judge Moore’s rationale for the court of appeals in Michigan Catholic Conference v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:58 pm
”" Ocegueda-Nunez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 12:45 pm
Trump and Hawaii v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm
In his recent majority opinion in the watershed Carpenter v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:46 am
A reader left a comment the other day pointing to an article in the Dayton Daily News that Greene County judges had adopted a new procedure, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:18 am
John Edward Green, a capital case. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
In 85-87 Pitt St., LLC v 85-87 Pitt St. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
On Oct. 3, the ACLU will be back in the Supreme Court to argue Jennings v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
On Oct. 3, the ACLU will be back in the Supreme Court to argue Jennings v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:54 pm
As I have said a few times, I believe that the First Circuit constantly gives green light to all sorts of prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 10:48 am
People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Rooker-Feldman only applies when you're a "state court loser," which is why it doesn't apply in this case.The case is Green v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am
The assumption is that defense counsel made a strategic choice not to raise repugnance, to avoid the remedy.Finally, repugnance is not tested by referring to what the law actually requires, it is tested by referring to the law as it was given to this jury, even if the charge was erroneous (People v Green, 71 NY2d 1006 [1988]). [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Smith-Green * Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
In Perlot v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:13 am
Greene and Alford v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 9:47 am
Inequality, social resilience, and the green economy. [read post]
