Search for: "People v Little" Results 301 - 320 of 13,324
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2011, 11:11 am
  And I'm more than a little bummed that the Court of Appeal didn't specifically reject this argument. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm by georgia harper
It relies on the little glimmer of hope that Justice Ginsburg planted in Eldred v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
A few days ago, District Judge Christina Snyder issued her 57-page ruling in American Trucking Ass’n v. [read post]
Notwithstanding this elucidation by the Court, the passage still does little to clarify what would constitute an “overwhelming supervening act”. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 12:04 pm
Attorney's Office a little more credit than credit is due.I'd have been extraordinarily impressed with the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
 'Cause there's exceptionally little that one generally has to say on these matters, I'd think, except:  "Your honor, she's 14, he's 25. [read post]
3 May 2021, 2:16 pm
  But to hold that she's eligible for the death penalty because she tried to kill herself just seems totally bizarre to me.That, anyway, is the little nugget out of the middle of an opinion that took me a couple of hours to read.Oh, one more thing. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
” She told him “for something like that it was going to be a little bit more,” and they went back and forth a couple of times regarding how much money defendant had. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
 No such weirdness.Okay, well, a little weirdness. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 12:48 pm
Eleven years in prison.On the merits, one can find little technical fault with Justice Needham's workmanlike opinion. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:33 pm
 For now, just take one little snippet from the motion this pro per criminal defendant filed on November 6, 2012, in which he "alleged that Judge Hirsch 'leaked' appellant's identity to the media after appellant accused Judge Hirsch of judicial corruption. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
The test has altered little since the 19th century, when in the 1885 case of Durham v Durham, it was stated: the contract of marriage is a very simple one, which does not require a high degree of intelligence to comprehend. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
People Kill People Gun Classified Ads Website Isn’t Liable for Murder–Vesely v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Of course, this case may be difficult in the current political context: for example, the politics of Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:15 am by JB
Bringing a challenge to same-sex marriage to federal court in 2010 is a little like trying to get the federal courts to decide Lawrence in 1972 or Loving in 1948, immediately after California's decision in Perez v. [read post]