Search for: "People v McDonald"
Results 301 - 320
of 881
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
To read the State Bar’s response and related filings in McDonald v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:02 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:45 am
The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled in a 2004 published case (People v Adams) that a defendant cannot assert a defense at trial of his or her, "inability to pay" the court-ordered child support.Accordingly, in the Likine case, the Attorney General requested trial judge John McDonald to preclude Likine from introducing any of the above facts regarding her disability and resulting lack of income from jury consideration. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:59 am
When someone at a party mentions the McDonald’s coffee case, a good lawyer can point out the salient facts — McDonald’s had hundreds of prior complaints about how hot its coffee was, the woman was horribly injured, she offered to settle for her medical expenses — between sips of his Cabernet. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 7:49 am
Applying to federal enclaves only (of which the District of Columbia is one), it was affirmed in 2010 with respect to the states in McDonald-v-Chicago. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:39 am
Building off that report, CAC filed an amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 4:24 am
II, XIV; McDonald v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Aug. 29, 2004) (noting that the trial court had upheld a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute; the defendant did not argue the First Amendment on appeal); People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:25 pm
When police decide how much force to use, they are subject to the 4th Amendment’s reasonableness standard, according to Graham v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
See People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:00 am
Long may they continue.Missed opportunity of the year – McDonald’s v Supermac – This was a case deemed so unfortunate that it deserved a category of its own. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:45 am
McDonald v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:15 am
This is a peculiar vision, but Marbury v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:10 am
People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 8:02 am
McDonald (1984) 37 Cal.3d 351, 367 (overruled on other grounds in People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:10 pm
DOM beat us to the punch with his post on the excellent SCOTUS opinion in Wooden v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am
Your name is a part of who you are, your own identity, and for a lot of people, a very important indicator of their history and origin. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:45 am
So Long, Secretary Perez: DOL Head’s Goodbye Message — via Wage & Hour Insights Ochoa v. [read post]
