Search for: "People v Person"
Results 301 - 320
of 31,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
This case could determine whether police can examine all kinds of personal digital data without a search warrant. [read post]
24 May 2018, 4:55 pm
In Naruto v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:50 pm
I'm far from the most tech-savvy person in the universe. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
When I saw that this case involved an appeal of a conviction of a sex offender for failing to update his address, I initially thought it'd be one of those innumerable cases where a person forgets or waits a couple of days too long after his birthday to reregister, and gets thrown back into jail for a decade as a result.Nope.Here the guy registers for eight straight years, but apparently gets sick of it. [read post]
23 May 2010, 8:52 am
District Court Judge James V. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Gennady V. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 7:31 am
At least not for purposes of filing a habeas corpus petition.The case is The Nonhuman Rights Project v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 1:49 pm
SEPTA v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 1:48 pm
Leach in the decision of Ismail v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 4:49 pm
So I did a Gogle Scholar search on some key personal-sovereignty words: "sovereign citizen," and hit on U.S. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
Under the rubric of special needs, the Court has approved of such practices as suspicionless visual strip searches of people entering the general population of a detention facility, in Florence v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
Continue reading → The post Undivided v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:47 am
In Bradley v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 1:25 pm
In People v Helmer (2009 NY Slip Op 04830 4th Dept 6/12/09) the sole issue was whether the victim was a stranger to defendant for purposes of determining whether defendant should have been assessed 20 points on the risk assessment instrument for risk factor 7, "[r]elationship with victim. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Bidwell to Boumediene V. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 1:12 pm
No reasonable person could have believed that they were not free to leave the voluntary conversation with the officers. [read post]
9 May 2015, 12:22 pm
Our clients are “people” and not “cases” or “files. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 12:50 am
That last one real trips people up. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
In California v. [read post]
