Search for: "People v Younger" Results 301 - 320 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2010, 9:02 am by Paul
Well, for the most part … What most people don’t realise is that this general rule doesn’t apply to minors, that is children or people under the age of 18. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:02 pm by Paul Jacobson
What most people don't realise is that this general rule doesn't apply to minors, that is children or people under the age of 18. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
  It is regulated and controlled by law based upon principles of public policy affecting the welfare of the people of the State.' Fearon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:23 pm by Jeffrey Carr
After Senate Bill 7026, the law now reads: A person younger than 21 years of age may not purchase a firearm. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:12 am by Russ Bensing
  There’s a limit to how much you can do that, though; overcrowding in California prisons led to last year’s Supreme Court decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 11:03 am by Stephen Bilkis
She may only be guilty of a violation of section 81 of the Penal law as held in People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
I remember a warm amiable guy who took great delight in pointing out several times throughout the day, that I wasn’t as knowledgeable as my cocky, younger self thought he was. [read post]