Search for: "People v. Blunt"
Results 301 - 320
of 531
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2014, 12:16 pm
Nickolai V. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm
According to the New York Times, the blast killed four people, among those two policemen, and wounded nine. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Creepy People The law is a pretty blunt instrument. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 3:46 am
This point is driven home in People v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
Defendant acknowledges that this claim was rejected by the First Department in People v Ferrer but argues, inter alia, that the decision is so conclusory that it cannot act as a barrier to consideration by this Court. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
At least 147 people were sickened, and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:51 am
The Court’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:43 am
” This blunt response is a great decision for privacy. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
As Counsel notes, the evident intent of the subdivision (c) is to ‘protect the people’s initiative powers by precluding the Legislature from undoing what the people have done, without the electorate’s consent. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
California and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:24 am
Something seems very wrong here, because the report is that the Supreme Court has unanimously held in Riley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 3:46 pm
In Authors Guild v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:25 pm
In Authors Guild v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:29 am
State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:19 pm
See Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm
That makes the "Steve Jobs patent" a blunt sword at best. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 7:39 pm
I think the text is clear, but reasonable people may differ on this point. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:51 am
Martinez, et al v. [read post]
