Search for: "People v. Burden (1980)"
Results 301 - 320
of 409
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 4:07 am
In People v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:32 am
The court in People v Villa (2009) 45 C4th 1063, 1068, 90 CR3d 344 called it the greatest remedy known to the law whereby one unlawfully restrained of his liberty can secure his release. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:00 am
A decision issued this week, on 5/1/12, “Zamora v Neurologic Assn. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
Some people complain about data-mining. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
In any event, putting aside the parallelism or lack thereof, here I want to explore the significance of whether a law benefits or burdens a minority group. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
App. 1980); Dano v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:40 pm
In Sherbert v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm
Where the opportunity exists and where the beneficiary can be identified, the cost burden of providing these services should be placed on the beneficiary’s shoulders rather than the public’s. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Because of such risks, the FDA forces people to jump through the hoop of visiting a doctor before these products are made available to them. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Wadszinski, 422 A.2d 124, 129–30 (Pa. 1980) (dictum); Vanasco v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Wadszinski, 422 A.2d 124, 129–30 (Pa. 1980) (dictum); Vanasco v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:31 am
In Kessler v Kessler, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 5241275 (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept.) on June 10, 1980, after 25 years of marriage, the parties entered into a separation agreement, which provided that the plaintiff husband would make payments to the defendant wife for her support and maintenance and for the mortgage and carrying costs relating to the marital residence, where the defendant continued to reside. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm
In NLRB v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:46 am
" Id. at 27, citing Lance v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
Subdivision three has been held to require an actually existing weapon (People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400 [1980]). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
Subdivision three has been held to require an actually existing weapon (People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400 [1980]). [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
In fact, the most extensive study on SLAPPs to date, which was conducted in the late 1980s, found that plaintiffs did not succeed 77-82% of the time.[10] SLAPP lawsuits primarily wreak their mischief through the litigation process.[11] The plaintiff uses the various steps in the litigation process to waste the time and drain the financial resources of the defendant. [read post]
