Search for: "People v. Burns" Results 301 - 320 of 1,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2009, 11:42 am
  On Tuesday, the Wisconsin Supreme Court (somewhat reluctantly) ruled against a man who had a faulty Medtronic defibrillator upholding Riegel v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:26 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
At the same time, it’s not surprising to see this lawsuit crash and burn. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 3:57 am by SHG
Could it be possible that the Louisiana Supreme Court was that desperate to avoid holding invocation of the right to counsel that it burned Warren Demesme over a comma? [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:12 am
This conception of the human as homo fabulans (or story-telling animal) could lead us to outline a 'Critique of Narrative Reason'.Click here to purchase paper Recovering the Lost Human Stories of Law: Finding Mrs BurnsDawn WatkinsAbstract: This paper adopts a narrative approach as a means to investigating a well-known English civil law case; Burns v Burns [1984] Ch 317. [read post]
You’ve likely heard of the famous McDonald’s “hot coffee” case, in which 79-year-old Stella Liebeck – in Liebeck v. [read post]