Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT"
Results 301 - 320
of 621
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
During a confirmation hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, Wendy Vitter, whom President Trump has nominated for a federal district court judgeship in Louisiana, refused to say whether she thought Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:43 am
My preview of City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Included among those protected by “absolute immunity” are legislators in connection with their legislative duties and judicial and quasi-judicial officers performing judicial or quasi-judicial functions. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:34 am
According to the Supreme Court (Connick v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:25 am
” In June 2017, the Supreme Court handed down a unanimous decision, Honeycutt v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Lastly, Kaspersky claims that it has standing to assert Fifth Amendment due process rights because it has “substantial connections” to the United States based on its employment of 300 people in Massachusetts and its sales to customers and thus, comes under the framework announced in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In Martin v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Before the Supreme Court’s 1973 ruling in Roe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
A judicial decision on the papers is awaited. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
,majority) (Frost, C.J., dissenting).MAJORITY PANEL OPINION IN GODOY V WFBNAGERALD GODOY, Appellant,v.WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.No. 14-16-00599-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston.Majority and Dissenting Opinions Opinions filed October 31, 2017.Kathleen Hoekstra Boll, Charles L. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
,majority) (Frost, C.J., dissenting).MAJORITY PANEL OPINION IN GODOY V WFBNAGERALD GODOY, Appellant,v.WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Appellee.No. 14-16-00599-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston.Majority and Dissenting Opinions Opinions filed October 31, 2017.Kathleen Hoekstra Boll, Charles L. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
Baird.In 1973, the Supreme Court held in Roe v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
With a deadlock in district court, the Davis case would head automatically to the Supreme Court. [read post]
