Search for: "People v. David" Results 301 - 320 of 5,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Defendant Sanofi challenged plaintiffs’ statistical expert witness, David Madigan, a frequent testifier for the lawsuit industry. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:18 am
The much anticipated preemption case, Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 pm by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) In comments to some of my recent posts, some commenters have suggested that few people nowadays get especially worked up about Lochner v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:17 pm by Mark Bennett
ers”: I Salute You « THE TRIAL WARRIOR BLOG Rakofsky Tries to Muzzle the Blawgosphere – Avvo Blog My Law License: Joseph Rakofsky's Second Futile Race To The Courthouse Digging Deeper and Deeper – & Trivial Update The Rakofsky Standard | David Sugerman From the Complaints Desk [For Those About to Rakofsky (We Salute You)] Defending People » The Rakofsky v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
David Agema (a Michigan state representative) and some other people organized a Jan. 26, 2012 event that included as a speaker Kamal Saleem. [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
The point is that unrepresented people not be dragged into court and asked to defend their interests without an attorney. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
David Frederick began arguments for the state of Maine with a lengthy exchange with the Chief Justice and Justice Alito, both of whom were hard pressed to find a distinction between this case and Riegal v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:46 am by David Bernstein
(David Bernstein) Last week, Eugene blogged about the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Fair Housing Council v. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am by David Kopel
(David Kopel) To me, today’s decision of the United States District Court for the District of Utah in Brown v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am by James Eckert
  My own view was that this was an obvious due process violation, as the defendant's status as a sex offender was determined at a proceeding which denied him notice and an opportunity to be heard (much as the original SORA classification process struck down in People v David W, 95 NY2d 130 [2000] [holding that the availability of an Article 78 was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process as to the level of classification]). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
   Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]