Search for: "People v. Downing (1985)"
Results 301 - 320
of 509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2013, 2:44 pm
Of the remaining 25 counts, 19 involved incidents occurring between September 1983 and November 1984 and 6 involved incidents occurring between November 1984 and December 1985. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
And in People Express Airlines v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 9:19 am
In Stempler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:11 pm
Say, then, there are two people. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
Many people think that the Court should adopt 2 or 3 but not 1, because 1 is in some senses the most “broad. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
White people say to us—‘This Measure will be for your good. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fund, 473 U.S. 788, 811 (1985) (“The First Amendment does not forbid a viewpoint neutral exclusion of speakers who would disrupt a nonpublic forum and hinder its effectiveness for its intended purpose. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:22 am
I then conducted a Terry Pat Down on Mr. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 12:31 am
Lee, 470 U.S. 753 (1985), which expressly considered when the government can get a warrant to perform surgery on a suspect for evidence in their body. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 am
” Perhaps these examples can be dismissed as an effort by the courts not to elevate form over substance when dealing with the rights of people who are guilty of crimes. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm
In the watershed and famous case taught in first year law school classes - Chaplinsky v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:35 am
See Glik v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
(See Ford v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
I think that oftentimes people refer to infringement as theft in the colloquial sense of the word, but it’s the legal meaning of the term that I will focus on. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:36 pm
; People ex rel. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 11:07 am
”6 In support, he cites Eldred v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
