Search for: "People v. Downs" Results 301 - 320 of 18,924
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2024, 10:16 am by Courtney Finerty-Stelzner
On June 23, 2022, the United States Supreme Court, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:10 am by Catherine Reach
For simple protection, you can right click the resulting template files, choose properties, and make them read only so people won’t accidentally over-write them. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Katherine Yon Ebright
” Some have suggested that the courts would strike down Trump’s scheme on those grounds. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Will Baude
But at least listen when I say this: There are lots of people, and even lots of law students, outside the bubble. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Purcell recounts, the Taft Court understood itself as an unmediated channel for the values and mores of the American people. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC [2024] EWHC 343 (KB). [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 People will game them in all sorts of ways that dilute their information, whether that’s product review manipulation or otherwise. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 3:10 am by SHG
If accepted, can this argument be used to discriminate against black people, women, gay people and transgender people? [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm by Steven Calabresi
 The Supreme Court doubled-down on its support for the unlimited regulation of occupational freedom in Williamson v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:50 pm by David Super
  Many of these same people likely would become delegates in an actual Article V convention. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am by Guest Author
  Striking rules down in that circumstance, courts have decided, would be disruptive and harmful: it would create the very dangers (here, tens of millions of people exposed to unhealthy air pollution) that Congress intended the agency to prevent. [read post]