Search for: "People v. Friedman"
Results 301 - 320
of 616
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 12:16 pm
Bd. of Ed. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am
Howard Friedman (Religion Clause) for the pointer. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
The recent decision of the Michigan Supreme Court in People v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am
The inspirational trigger is me cooking meatballs in red wine and tomato sauce whilst listening to an argument on Radio 4’s ‘PM’ programme about planning permission v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:15 am
Filing a timely administrative appealMatter of Friedman v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2011 NY Slip Op 32313(U), Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 104301/11, Judge: Donna M. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
Berry was offered a job at Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:37 pm
[V]oters show they are fairly cynical about Democratic politicians’ stands. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:25 am
Illinois, No. 10-8505, seeking review of People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
Brian Frye has an interesting post up over at Concurring Opinions on Friedman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 2:27 pm
[V]irtually everyone has become a suspect. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:42 pm
Div’n of Youth & Family Servs. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:33 am
Under vouchers, the prison system would come within Zelman v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:16 am
We the people need to think about the events in the news, and some expert opinion is helpful. [read post]
22 May 2011, 2:36 pm
Connecticut and Roe v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 11:00 am
Barry Friedman (New York University School of Law) has posted Discipline and Method: The Making of the Will of the People (Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2010, p. 877-920) on SSRN. [read post]
14 May 2011, 7:23 am
Robert Friedman v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As Dan Ikenson and I wrote a few months ago: [V]oluntary economic exchange is inherently fair, benefits both parties, and allocates scarce resources more efficiently than a system under which government dictates or limits choices. [read post]
