Search for: "People v. Green" Results 301 - 320 of 2,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2020, 3:07 pm by Patricia Salkin
Green Mountain Fireworks, LLC v Town of Colchester, 2020 WL 4556800 (VT 8/7/2020) [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am by Eric Goldman
(An aside: O’Handley’s “combined social media following across all his accounts currently reaches over 3 million people and he has made 75 national news appearances in the last year and [a] half. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:58 pm by Nathan Sheard
In his recent majority opinion in the watershed Carpenter v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
A reader left a comment the other day pointing to an article in the Dayton Daily News that Greene County judges had adopted a new procedure, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 9:53 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:54 pm
As I have said a few times, I believe that the First Circuit constantly gives green light to all sorts of prosecutorial misconduct. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 10:57 pm
Rooker-Feldman only applies when you're a "state court loser," which is why it doesn't apply in this case.The case is Green v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 7:12 am by James Eckert
The assumption is that defense counsel made a strategic choice not to raise repugnance, to avoid the remedy.Finally, repugnance is not tested by referring to what the law actually requires, it is tested by referring to the law as it was given to this jury, even if the charge was erroneous (People v Green, 71 NY2d 1006 [1988]). [read post]