Search for: "People v. Harmon"
Results 301 - 320
of 369
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
To achieve that goal, vested interests want to harmonize international standards. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:16 am
The ObamaCare subsidies challenge, Halbig v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 7:22 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
” The proposal for a new regulation would harmonize the rules on beneficial ownership and clarify essential aspects. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Things have to be justified relative to the brand/mark, and not with respect to the people. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract: Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 1:24 pm
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version).We have been unpacking what might at first appear to be a rather straightforward inquiry: "what is law?" [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" He briefly discusses Romer v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm
Del.) in Jankowicz v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:19 pm
P., V. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
The work plan speaks of harmonizing approaches to UAVs. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
Has the permissive language of “may” referred to the in the SCC decision in CBC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
