Search for: "People v. Ing"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
More importantly, the law’s definition of “censor” includes “post[ing] an addendum to any content or material posted by a user”…so, um, yeah, the law absolutely interferes with messages the services want to deliver. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
"As to considering hearsay evidence in an administrative hearing, the Appellate Division said that "hearsay is admissible as competent evidence in an administrative proceeding, and if sufficiently relevant and probative may constitute substantial evidence even if contradicted by live testimony on credibility grounds" [see Matter of Watson v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 152 AD3d 1025]. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
The malware included a remote access tool (`RAT’), which enabled users `to remotely control victims' computers, including [by] captur[ing] the victims' keystrokes as they type’—the `keylogger’ function--`turn [ing] on their webcams, and search[ing] through their personal files. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:09 am
One of the issues raised in the Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 6:00 pm
See Carey v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:35 am
* It could only happen in America: PETA litigates over macaque selfieOne of those stories that lead people to hate animals. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Those attending a shareholder proposal meeting on behalf of management are unlikely to be the same people negotiating with the union. [read post]
14 May 2007, 11:29 am
The John Doe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 10:01 am
The Florida Act bars professors from "espous[ing], promot[ing], or advanc[ing]," Fla. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:44 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
In Catlett v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:44 pm
The newest salvo comes from Ohio, the land that gave us US v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
Aaron Caplan in Ellis v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 8:48 am
Given our visibility, we know they're serious people, bent on destruction. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:03 am
Tort law that makes actionable outrageous conduct that recklessly or intentionally inflicts serious emotional distress could be applied to speech that distresses people because of its content (see Hustler v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 4:47 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 8:58 am
Steffel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Nixon v. [read post]
