Search for: "People v. Kennedy"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
KENNEDY v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
Supreme Court has issued its King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 9:47 am
That is, Justices Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas will certainly vote to uphold a law passed by the Republican Party, claiming to be the "people of Indiana," that has the almost certain consequences of helping suppress the likely Democratic vote. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:06 am
Here are a few quick running thoughts from today's oral argument in Gill v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 7:08 am
“Writers and reporters by necessity alter what people say, at the very least to eliminate grammatical and syntactical infelicities,” Justice Kennedy wrote in Masson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:31 am
Frederick brings up an interesting argument during a dialogue with Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 7:16 am
If you describe what happened and people look puzzled and ask "So what? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:50 am
Forget about the aggregation principle from Wickard v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 6:47 pm
Bilski v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
That opinion was joined by seven Justices - Justice Scalia (who wrote it), along with the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, and Alito.Yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 4:54 pm
Back in 2003, Justice Scalia, dissenting from Kennedy’s opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 9:06 pm
Loving v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:50 am
" Since ruling in Batson v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:22 pm
It was 26 years ago, in State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
The police encountered twelve people at the home, but Bowen was not among them. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
Trump (4th Cir.) and Hawaii v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
There is nothing in Roe v. [read post]
