Search for: "People v. Laws"
Results 301 - 320
of 54,597
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
"Open container" laws for alcohol, in my view, are only loosely analogous to "open container" laws for marijuana. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:36 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:19 am
Richard Aynes is a law professor at the University of Akron, and signed an amicus brief for the petitioners in McDonald v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(People v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 2:21 am
Judgment has now been handed down in R (Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39, in which Regulations made under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) were challenged. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:37 pm
" State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 10:22 am
Many people have asked me if the Second Circuit’s opinion in CFPB v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
People v Kelly Court Discusses a Defendant’s Confrontation Rights Regarding Breathalyzer Machines The Defendant was arrested of driving under the influence after the arresting officer observed his erratic behavior including swerving and nearly striking the traffic delineators. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 10:16 am
Original Article Excerpt: It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is modified on the law by determining that defendant is a level one risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act and as modified the order is affirmed without costs. [read post]
10 Mar 2006, 9:34 pm
In Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am
As part of the DMCA, Congress enacted a cause of action for people who send bogus copyright takedown notices, codified at 17 USC 512(f). [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The people who wrote Prop. 21 knew full well how to lock in the existing statutory definitions when that's what they intended. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:37 pm
The purpose of Prop. 36 was to provide relief for many people given life sentences for nonviolent offenses.But there were exceptions. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
This was an issue of law. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
This decision continues the trend of striking down campaign finance laws, a trend made famous in Citizens United v. [read post]
