Search for: "People v. Lines"
Results 301 - 320
of 11,985
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 12:03 pm
But I will give you one line from the opinion, which is also unusual:"A.C. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
I thought that the victim was initially a certain age, then later I thought that I must have gotten it wrong, only to find out (upon further review) that I was right all along.Regardless, it's not the fact pattern that might instantly spring to mind when you read the first line:"A jury convicted Andres Lujano of sodomy of an intoxicated person (Pen. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 11:00 pm
Basically, Generation V is made up of people who replace physical experience with an online experience, Sarner added. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
20 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
Smith and Desmond King’s compelling and sobering book, America’s New Racial Battle Lines: Protect v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:43 pm
Commentators have treated the Court’s decision in Whitford v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
The overarching consequence of R v Jogee is that the mental element for accessories has now been brought back into line with that which is required by principal offenders, prior to Chan Wing-Siu. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
Some, like Justice Scalia for the Court in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:47 pm
Along this line, compare Justice Scalia's discussion of text in the Hatch-Waxman Act in Merck v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
Even though that would indeed solve the "illegal sentence" problem while avoiding the frustration of settled expectations.Sure, there's a line-drawing problem. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 4:53 am
People v. [read post]
22 May 2025, 3:45 am
It’s been clear for a while now that the Trump administration ignored Judge Boasberg’s order, violated Judge Xinis’ order and even ignored the Supreme Court’s decision in Noem v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:39 pm
R. v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:51 am
The case, Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
Joseph V. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:27 pm
Ditto for people in sham marriages, it seems to me.Now, admittedly, there are some line-drawing problems. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
Candidates who veer from the party line are excoriated in the media outlets that back that party, the people don't vote for them and ideas aren't allowed to germinate, making this polarization a self-perpetuating cycle. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:20 am
Kenyon v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 7:30 am
People v Adams, Court of Appeals No. 287034. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Thompson of the Second District Court of Appeal is famous for his acrostic jibe at the dissent in People v. [read post]
