Search for: "People v. May (1989)" Results 301 - 320 of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2014, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Superior Court (1989) 209 Cal.App.3d 1266, 1273-1274 (pdf), cits. omitted.) [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:17 am by Adam Thimmesch
(I believe that it should, as do most people who have studied the issue.) [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 9:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Paiva, 892 F.2d 148, 157 (1st Cir. 1989) ("Although a drug user may not qualify as an expert, he or she may still be competent, based on past experience and personal knowledge and observation, to express an opinion as a lay witness that a particular substance perceived was cocaine or some other drug. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:01 am by Administrator
Quebec (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 927, at p. 1004. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 8:52 am
In this respect, the Court must bear in mind that the right of every person under the Convention to be presumed innocent includes the general rule that no suspicion regarding an accused's innocence may be voiced after his acquittal (see Asan Rushiti v. [read post]