Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 301 - 320 of 15,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2013, 11:39 am
 That the victim recanted her testimony to two people, it says, is more powerful than the fact that she recanted her testimony to one. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 1:21 pm
His ex-business partner said that he "noticed changes in Gerson after Gerson started using drugs, including 'constantly' talking about various conspiracy theories, claiming he was God and that he had special powers," and had "witnessed Gerson 'high' from marijuana hundreds of times but described Gerson on other drugs as 'something totally, totally different.'” Gerson's ex-girlfriend, Alisha, said basically the same thing. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Lest one think that the Oregon court’s expansive conception of the clemency power is merely a relic of a bygone era, this view was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in 1998.In Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Political power slippery slopes may also be driven by changes in the number of people who feel personally affected by a particular policy, as in the school choice example—people who start using a valuable government service become a constituency for political decisions that preserve and expand this service. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 7:20 am by Glenn Reynolds
DEPLOYING SOCIAL PRESSURE IN WISCONSIN: “We have seen the power of a single mailer disclosing the voting behavior of oneself and one’s neighbors.” Ann Althouse comments: “It’s important for people to know when political organizations, like the Greater Wisconsin Political Fund, are deliberately using a psychological manipulation that has been tested and studied. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:57 am by Adam Cox
Indeed, Roberts relied heavily on Justice Robert Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 1:54 pm by Epstein Becker Green
Nor does the Biden Administration appear even to have the constitutional authority to do so for the reasons outlined in the Supreme Court’s West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 11:05 am by JB
Because so many powerful and influential people made these arguments, mainstream media felt compelled to treat them as serious legal claims and this also helped support their reasonableness.The composition of the federal bench also matters, because an argument is more likely to be thought plausible, and possibly succeed, if many federal judges are likely to entertain it and take it seriously.Let's apply this analysis to Texas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by Jon
How creative do officials have to get in depriving people of their rights until courts and the people say it has become downright bizarre? [read post]