Search for: "People v. Roberts"
Results 301 - 320
of 7,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 6:49 pm
Jian Tang and Robert Campbell met in May 2016 on Match.com., an online dating site. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:13 pm
The language of colorblindness that Roberts and Thomas use to make their argument comes directly from Justice John Marshall Harlan's lonely dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
Most people likely think the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am
Ben Roberts-Smith has launched an appeal after he lost his war crimes defamation trial in the federal court. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
The headline in The Economist reads: “A new Supreme Court case may dampen protections for LGBT people. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
He has now taken testimony from two of the most important witnesses in the case, former Vice President Pence[1] and Trump’s former Chief of Staff Mark Meadows,[2] and recently interviewed a third, Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani.[3] Smith has also taken testimony from an array of other key witnesses including: former White House Counsel Pat Cipollone,[4] his former deputy Pat Philbin,[5] former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino,[6] former National Security Advisor… [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 4:16 pm
The Hustler magazine question relies on a strong reading of NY Times v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:54 pm
Quoting its 1978 opinion in TVA v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:20 am
Blue v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
Robert Lighthizer has a new book on trade policy. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
Robert Lighthizer has a new book on trade policy. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 2:02 am
President and Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Co. of Philadelphia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
” He alleged that the prosecutor had used his peremptory challenges to keep more Blacks from serving on his jury.In Batson v Kentucky, the Court held that “While a defendant is not entitled to have a jury completely or partially composed of people of his own race, the state is not permitted to use its peremptory challenges to automatically exclude potential members of the jury because of their race. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
An approach more aware of regular people’s concerns must therefore come from the agencies and their work in the courts. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm
A little censorship leads people to watch what they say. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
I admit that I'm no expert in the doctrine in this area, though I do watch it out of the corner of my eye, and I can't recall reading a more ridiculous standing decision in the last 10 years or so than the one the Court endorsed in the 303 Creative v. [read post]
