Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,942
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
For a sampling of some of the other issues it raises, see this recent symposium about it at the Balkinization site. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:35 pm
Related Cases: People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:18 am
The Second Circuit also orders injunctive relief in favor of the abortion providers.The case is People of the State of New York v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:46 am
A reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction test (RT-PCR assay) also can detect norovirus in food, water, stool samples, and on surfaces. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
The power to make knowledge claims v. the people who have been erased from/made invisible in our narratives. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 11:33 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am
When the Stratton Oakmont v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 5:11 am
As summarized by the European research and advocacy organization Communia: "Based on a survey conducted among a representative sample of French internet users above 15, the report shows that 33% of all French internet users have shared audio or video material from third parties on platforms. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm
The agency is also collecting samples and has detected Yersinia isolates from patients in these regions. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 6:31 pm
The software analyzed a DNA sample obtained by swabbing a weapon, a sample that likely contained the DNA of multiple people. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:44 am
In a 4-3 opinion, the Arizona high court ruled in State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 10:27 am
Jacket L1 v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 8:34 am
State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
Further, the Court explained: [The witness] thoroughly explained the methods and procedures of performing autosomal testing and analyzed defendant’s DNA sample following those procedures. [read post]
