Search for: "People v. Stock" Results 301 - 320 of 1,683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am by David Markus
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Instead of taking stock and accepting that he lacked plausible defences, the defendant persisted in taking actions which served to aggravate more than mitigate. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 12:29 pm
Its common stock was traded on the over-the- counter bulletin board and registered with the SEC. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
He sued in London on the publications which took place within the jurisdiction of England and Wales – although the newspaper is not published in hard copy in the UK, the defendants accepted that it might have been read here on the internet by a few people. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:11 am
Recently, Florida's Fourth District Court of Appeal, in the case of Burton v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
by Jeremy Leaming Since the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 9:11 am by John Jascob
FMR LLC (2014)), limited its reach (rejecting a broad reading of its anti-shredding provision in Yates v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:25 am by Ilya Somin
Migration patterns in favor of economic freedom are even more stark when we look more broadly, and consider people who risk their lives fleeing socialist or communist states such as Cuba.For reasons I discuss in this new article, and Part V of this older one, people often make better-informed decisions when they vote with their feet than at the ballot box (where economic liberty is, of course, much less popular). [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
”  The Court of Appeals recently reiterated that sentiment in Thyroff v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:58 pm
The IPKat is reliably informed that Mann J's summary was available in court to anyone who asked, and that there were many people in the public gallery. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 11:59 am by Giles Peaker
AB & Anor, R (On the Application Of) v Westminster City Council (2024) EWHC 266 (Admin) This was a judicial review of both the suitability of accommodation provided to a homeless couple, and also of Westminster’s policy of sourcing temporary accommodation, which was claimed to indirectly discriminate against disabled people. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:25 am by Steve Bainbridge
“We are simply pushing people to do more business overseas rather than addressing the real issues head on. [read post]