Search for: "People v. Terry"
Results 301 - 320
of 792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 am
Jason McCourty Titans Jersey Jurrell Casey Jersey As with public school students, veterans enrolled at private universities have access to funds from various GI Bill programs, depending on the length of service, dates served and other factors5 and 12, choose a snowboard that features a 26 cm waist width For users who wish a big and clear screen and good overall quality, this is the way to go I’ve struggled with wanting to leave you for months but my big heart didn’t want to hurt YOU or… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in First Church of Cannabis, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Its 1968 ruling in Terry v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:13 am
Ohio and New York’s flavor, People v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 5:28 am
” People v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Kraemer, Sweatt v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:14 am
” Terry v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 4:11 am
” While he correctly notes that the scenario somehow involves Terry v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:53 am
However, in a landmark 1968 case, Terry v Ohio, the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
However, in a landmark 1968 case, Terry v Ohio, the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:09 am
Supreme Court decision in Terry v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
” Part 1 and Part 2 – Paul Bernal Is following people illegal? [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm
Terry v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
In addition to the confidentiality of the information sought, a subpoena duces tecum may not be used for purposes of procuring discovery, or to ascertain the existence of evidence (see Matter of Amex v Vinci, 63 AD3d 1055 [2d Dept. 2009]; Matter of Terry D., 81 NY2d 1042, 1044 [1993], citing People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 551 [1979]). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 5:53 am
In the case of Howes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:21 pm
I much appreciated being able to file a friend-of-the-court brief in Chan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 10:32 am
Sebelius may be the undoing of the challenge in King v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:51 pm
Terry v. [read post]
