Search for: "People v. Weight" Results 301 - 320 of 3,186
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2022, 5:56 am by Ambassador David Scheffer
-backed criminal tribunal regarding the crime of aggression against Ukraine would likely carry similar weight in prospective ICJ deliberations. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 1:52 am by Chijioke Okorie
It was for this reason (i.e., not providing information on how she got possession of the Opinion) that the court declined to give “a lot of weight” to the Opinion. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Marc DeGirolami
Or consider the doctrine of state sovereign immunity, which the Court said in Alden v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
One often-cited candidate is the document’s departure from the principle of equal weight for the votes of all citizens. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
…qualitative weight, including the cumulative weight of individual factors, some or all of which may not be specially rare, is all that has to be identified; and the requisite weight is that which is sufficient to outweigh the strong presumption against disposal by sale. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 10:43 am by INFORRM
Secondly, clause 4(1) would only require the court to give great weight to the importance of protecting the right to freedom of speech, not any (Art.10 or common law-based) right to receive information: see cl.4(2). [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:39 am
We see this discretion on full display in yesterday's Firearms Policy Coalition ruling.The court begins by determining that the carrying of guns by 18-to-20-year-olds falls within the text of the Second Amendment--concluding that people under the age of 21 fall within "the people," identified in the Second Amendment's, "right of the people to keep and bear arms. [read post]