Search for: "People v. Wells"
Results 301 - 320
of 26,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2013, 1:00 pm
As well as how much rides on that determination.A depressing case on every level. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:42 pm
And if you do all that when you're on probation, and hence subject to a search condition, wow, that's incredibly unwise.But when you do all this and you have some methamphetamine and a glass pipe in that same purse, well, at that point, I don't know what advise I can give you.The defendant here, Beatrice Aguirre, actually gets an amazing deal; she gets to plead guilty to only a single count of forgery for all of the above. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:23 pm
Whalum now wishes that he had just left well enough alone on this one. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 10:40 am
But the Court of Appeal holds that he still has to spend 180 days in jail as well, because that's the mandatory minimum sentence under Section 23552(a). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:13 pm
So it's going to be the quickest retrial in the history of California jurisprudence.As well as perhaps the most boring jury service ever. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:59 am
But there was some extra stuff in there as well. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
"Sadly, I fear that, in all probability, this life will not go, or end, well. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:42 am
As in many domestic violence cases, here, the victim is the only eyewitness besides the alleged perpetrator to the actual crime, and is the only one who can testify as to how she received her injuries.Despite the fact the key piece of evidence is an (admissible) hearsay statement from the victim's 911 call, the trial court erroneously refuses to allow multiple (admissible) hearsay statements from the victim that contradict her statements in the 911 call and in which she repeatedly tells the… [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 2:37 pm
In the Landmark cases -- known as People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 1:44 pm
Something that might well affect a future sentence, but didn't dramatically change this one. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:36 pm
So I thought others might be interested in those facts as well:"Respondent [Sergio Jose Lopez], a practicing attorney, was Sirena Zavala's boyfriend. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Imagine, for example, that a guy has a set of explosives wired up to a plunger, with twenty people in the area, with the goal of killing one person (Jim) therein but knowing full well that the explosion will kill all twenty. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 9:51 am
[cites to Doe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 12:59 pm
It was a horrendous deal, and the company was clearly preying on people who didn't know how to read very well. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Meuser v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:59 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
Which may well be idiosyncratic. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:37 pm
Or, as in this case, for serving such people? [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
And will play the lottery at trial as well to see if I can get zero. [read post]
