Search for: "People v. Winning"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
LBF (& Vice-Versa) * Trademark Owners Just Can’t Win Keyword Advertising Cases–EarthCam v. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
—Brent Weeks 1Sinjel v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:09 am
Provide examples of factors that weigh in favor of approval when USCIS officers perform the two-part “final merits” analysis under Kazarian v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
OPPO and Optis v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:51 am
Peace, development and win-win cooperation are the unstoppable trends of the times. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am
If so, Trump would win. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
I disagreed with key parts of her Epic Games v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:38 am
(It also depends on whether legislatures can rescind their ratifications, as some may have done; for more on that, see Michael Stokes Paulsen's General Theory of Article V.) [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
” In West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
If the Federalist Society gang wins, the Administrative State will have taken a crippling (but not quite fatal) wound. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
Competition winner Alexis Boddy’s winning essay is below. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 5:10 pm
I asked the UCLA Emmett Institute’s Distinguished Counsel Mary Nichols to share her thoughts after reading the decision in Held v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:25 am
At the same time, the trademark owner got its desired result because the advertiser removed the trademark from its ad copy, so the trademark owner could claim this lawsuit as a net win. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 2:17 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Each Monday we present brief excerpts of recent posts from five of Canada’s award-winning legal blogs chosen at random* from more than 80 recent Clawbie winners. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
The statute covers a very wide variety of federal officers and people acting under the direction of federal officers–including elected officials, federal civil employees, federal law enforcement officers, judges, postal workers, military officers, and more. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:47 am
That indeed proved to be the winning issue for Baldwin. [read post]