Search for: "People v. Young" Results 301 - 320 of 4,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2020, 7:05 am by Peter Briccetti
The film explains that after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
The OCC’s submission was that the duty to trace “is still a component of the search for a durable solution, that is, one which will last beyond their 18th birthday” [67] (v). [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
That is why both older generations and young people – those who were born after the tragic collapse of the Soviet Union – have voted for our unity, for our common future.In 1991 in Belovezhskaya Pushcha, representatives of the party elite of that time made a decision to terminate the Soviet Union, without asking ordinary citizens what they wanted, and people suddenly found… [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 12:15 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Keindl this was issue along the alleged prejudice of the jury with the testimony of expert witness. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:17 pm by Mark Bennett
For your enlightenment and amusement: How Young Lawyers Should NOT Conduct Themselves Online « An … Feeling Left Out – The Criminal Lawyer – Commentary on Law and Policy Simple Justice: Rakofsky v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  The panel included Patricia Hruby Powell and Shadra Strickland, the author and illustrator, respectively, of a new and illustrated young people’s book titled Loving vs. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 7:31 pm
The RIAA's case against this disabled single mother, Atlantic v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:38 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The complaint asserts that Tennessee—which has one of the fastest-growing immigrant populations in the US—is failing in its legal responsibility to ensure that immigrant youth are able to apply for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS), a type of immigration relief that confers critical benefits to young people. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am by Kirsten Sjvoll, Matrix Chambers
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 5:01 am
He told Bruns he deleted it because the images he uploaded were `too young. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:01 pm
”  Not something I especially want to see with "my 2 young daughters" in the car.On the other hand, I think there is an element -- an element -- of expression involved here. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:36 am by by PritzkerLaw
It is particularly dangerous for young children, people with compromised immune systems and the elderly. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Jacobs, The Eternal Criminal Record 33-51 (2015); Young & Petersilia, Keeping Track, 129 Harv. [read post]