Search for: "Perry v. Littles "
Results 301 - 320
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2011, 11:51 pm
Rick Perry to court. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:59 am
" Bhuiyan's lawsuit, Bhuiyan v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:44 am
It’s called: FDIC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
EMA and Lawrence v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:42 pm
Cheney Mason (12/12/2008) Read this little gem on the First Amendment. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:09 am
Given Perry's failure to stay the execution of Ernesto Medellin in 2008 - nothwithstanding the official position of the Bush administration to comply with the 2004 Avena decision of the ICJ - there is little about the Leal case to suggest that Perry will change his international law-breaking ways. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:10 pm
” The 7-2 decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 6:00 am
v=HAQ7mIkZtxQ&feature=related The Iowa DOT expects to close I-29 due to flooding of the Missouri River, so reports Perry Beeman for the Des Moines Register, DOT expects parts of I-29 to close because of floods. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:20 am
Although much of the news coverage of Twitter seems to have glossed over this point, such an order was granted in respect of Facebook as far back as 2008: Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 para 10. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:00 am
Although much of the news coverage of Twitter seems to have glossed over this point, such an order was granted in respect of Facebook as far back as 2008: Applause Store Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 para 10. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Orders The Court granted certiorari in one case yesterday, Perry v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am
It provides a little more detail and I recommend that you read it. [read post]
18 May 2011, 7:48 am
"Interestingly, if this case goes to court, the key Supreme Court precedent will be Van Orden v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:17 pm
V. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
Lemley lived through the declaration of independence of cyberspace, John Perry Barlow in 1994. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
For the Constitution in 2020 conference on The Future of Equality.Douglas NeJaimePopular accounts and media commentary on the federal suits challenging the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s Proposition 8 focus largely on the inevitable march toward marriage equality.Implicit in such accounts is a claim about the impact of favorable court decisions on the LGBT rights agenda.After a district court victory in the Massachusetts DOMA case and the more recent announcement by Attorney… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 7:37 am
I share my birthday with at least two other trademark attorneys: it’s also the birthday of my friend & mentor, Lynn Perry, and my former co-worker & current opponent in the V&T case, Matt Francis. [read post]
