Search for: "Peter J. Smith" Results 301 - 320 of 540
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mr Peter Mendham v East Anglian Daily Times, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mr Peter Mendham v Eastern Daily Press & East Anglian… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:11 am by New Books Script
Fiduciary duty and the atmospheric trust / edited by Ken Coghill, Charles Sampford, Tim Smith. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Steve Lombardi
This past Friday Iowa became the first state to outlaw using a pretext to gain entry in a J-O-B when what you really want to do is show criminal activity. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
– bit.ly/A0LSpr (Jennifer Connelly) Courts Tackle Spyware Interceptions - bit.ly/AbezOp (Peter Crusco) Criminal Law Catches Up: New ESI Guidelines Issued – bit.ly/yVpQvH (Shira Scheindlin, Jeffrey Rabkin) Data Preservation is Critical in Trade Secrets Cases | Littler - bit.ly/zpf7Gm (Douglas Wickham) E-Discovery: Avoiding eDiscovery Offenses in State Courts - bit.ly/xXmfK9 (Matthew Prewitt) eDiscovery Court Pilot Programs: eDiscovery… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 12:48 pm by Boston University Law Review
Smith Page 227 NOTES Defining a New Punctilio of an Honor: The Best Interest Standard for Broker-Dealers     Nicholas S. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
The Observer’s Peter Preston took a look at the wider picture, pointing out “the nature of this miserable affair, in short, goes deeper than Leveson. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:46 pm
Edward Peter Stringham, Fayetteville State University School of Business and Economics, and Todd J. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against the order of Tugendhat J ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) in JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]