Search for: "Peters v. The State of Texas"
Results 301 - 320
of 629
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The Characteristics of the Most-Litigated Patents’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Saving US innovation: more patent funding needed (IP Watchdog) BPAI backlog (Patently-O) Deadline to volunteer for the USPTO peer review pilot program is approaching (Patentably Defined) Check out the new beta test release of the USPTO’s website (Patentably Defined) (Just an Examiner) Second pair of eyes fails innovation in the US (IP Watchdog) USPTO needs improved workflow management… [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 5:41 am
Texas, LLC, 223 F.Supp.3d 1221 (M.D. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:43 pm
Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 11:19 am
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's… [read post]
18 Feb 2017, 4:37 am
Josh Blackman studied the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion in Washington v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 12:38 pm
Texas’ Solicitor General argued first. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am
In Baker v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IPKat) United States US General Sen Gregg withdraws from nomination to be next Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Influx of Big Content lawyers at Department of Justice: cause for concern? [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Montana Department of Revenue, Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 6:30 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:20 pm
Weltover and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Janis Graham Jack, in Corpus Christi, Texas. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 9:31 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff V. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
Some are saying ‘absolutely’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) US Patents BPAI shuts down dissent in favour of efficiency (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) BPAI statistics: how many opinions do BPAI judges write? [read post]
