Search for: "Petition of United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 23,952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 7:11 pm
United States, the Internal Revenue Service can tax as “local telephone service” under 26 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 8:23 pm
The petition of the day is: Merck & Cie v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
United States 13-744 Issue: Whether a medical professional can be convicted of “knowingly and willfully” making a false statement in medical records or reports under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:07 pm
The petition of the day is: Risen v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:04 pm
The petition of the day is: Droganes v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 7:10 pm
The petition of the day is: Hammond v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 8:00 pm
United States 14-1085 Issue: 1. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:02 pm
The petition of the day is: DiCristina v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:05 pm
United States (1972)? [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:14 pm
United States 13-983 Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 6:48 am
Employer letters are a significant part of the petition, because they sponsor you and emphasize your extraordinary ability and how that would be beneficial to the employer in the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 3:17 am
Employer letters are a significant part of the petition, because they sponsor you and emphasize your extraordinary ability and how that would be beneficial to the employer in the United States. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:10 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2008, 10:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:12 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 7:40 am
United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 10:54 am
(See my post, "Can I petition for my relative to immigrate to the United States? [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Title: United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 10:50 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released an update to its study on multiple Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) petitions that it says demonstrates that serial and parallel petition practice at the PTAB has been decreasing since 2016, when the Office first issued guidance on the subject. [read post]
