Search for: "Petty v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
City of Maplewood] “Does the Excessive Fines Clause Apply to the States? [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 3:34 pm
Over a century ago, the Indiana Supreme Court in Webb v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 10:26 am by Daniel Harawa
Congress amended ACCA to include the clause in order to ensconce the solicitor general’s position in United States v. [read post]
    Unfortunately, in 2013, the Supreme Court crippled one of the most effective protections of that act in its Shelby County v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 8:07 am by Ken White
To its credit, the Supreme Court took only three years to correct itself in West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 12:21 pm by Howard Wasserman
Today is the 70th anniversary of West Virginia State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:27 am
NEW TRIAL - Also principal instruction improper as one man fled in regards to the plan to get a cab ride without paying, petty theft, when they reached the destination and the other remained in the cab and shot the cab driverWilliams. 34 FLW 685, 4th DCA, PRR no error in imposing PRR sentence for Felony Battery where he was adj. guilty under statute which requires Great Bodily Harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement and crime committed could not be committed without the use or… [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court predictably handed down the Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:15 pm
That’s not a crime under North Carolina law, the North Carolina Court of Appeals held today in State v. [read post]