Search for: "Pillars v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am by Mukarrum Ahmed
The UK Supreme Court decisions are in alignment with the ethos of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (“Ruggie Principles”), particularly the pillar focusing on greater access by victims to an effective remedy. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:34 am by David Hart QC
The EU Aarhus Regulation says it enforces all three elements (or pillars, in Euro-speak). [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
20 May 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
In line with previous case law such as In ‘t Veld v Council, the Court required [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
The fundamental operative structure of the UNGP State duty to protect was grounded on the premise of international legality embedded within the principles of the state system. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:34 am by Larry Catá Backer
They provide the normative and operational standard for the implementation of the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for business and human rights structured around three pillars:[3]• The State duty to protect against human rights abuses by third parties, including business enterprises, through policies, regulation and adjudication. [read post]