Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 301 - 320
of 177,676
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit (unpublished): If things happened the way the plaintiffs say, that was obviously excessive force. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
Rejecting plaintiff's claim that the hospital violated Title VII by refusing to accommodate her religious beliefs, the court said in part:[T]he Court concludes that Plaintiff's requested accommodation was not reasonable as it was a blanket exemption request which would have allowed her to continue interacting with staff and vulnerable patients while unvaccinated. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
I can’t see what’s happening in state court, but I have no reason to believe that it’s any less contentious. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:15 am
Today's advance release tort law opinion: Wylie v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:14 am
June 7, 2024), the Plaintiff’s oil and gas leases had a late charge provision that provided for interest on unpaid royalties at a rate of 18% and said the charge was due and payable on the last day of each month. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:08 am
Riley(Claim for exemption from bank execution pursuant to statute ((Supp. 2022) § 52-376b); claim that trial court improperly determined that plaintiff's opposition to claim of exemption was barred by doctrine of collateral estoppel or res judicata; claim that trial 2 court improperly failed to hold evidentiary hearing before granting defendant's claim for exemption from execution). [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 8:36 am
Therefore, the plaintiffs lack standing to challenge FDA’s actions. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 5:26 am
To give just one of Justice Kavanaugh's examples, under the plaintiffs' theory, an EPA decision to roll back emissions standards could be challenged by doctors who say that this will lead to more patients with asthma. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 2:00 am
Evans Law Firm, Inc. is proud to announce that the firm’s founder, Ingrid M. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
” And, in this instance, it thought that DB had stated a contract breach claim.Among other things, he “alleged (1) the existence of an employment contract, (2) plaintiff's performance under the contract, (3) that defendants breached the contract by not paying him, and (4) resulting damages. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm
In a unanimous decision, the Court determined that the plaintiffs who opposed the FDA approval of the drug were not personally harmed by the FDA’s policies because none of the plaintiffs had ever prescribed or used the drug. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Chief Justice John Weimer dissented, as did Justices William Crain and Jay McCallum.The plaintiffs and the State’s Attorney General asked the court to rehear the case. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:51 pm
It's well established that, if a plaintiff has "concrete plans" to visit an animal's habitat and view that animal, that plaintiff suffers aesthetic injury when an agency has approved a project that threatens the animal. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:00 pm
For that reason, the federal courts are the wrong forum for addressing the plaintiffs’ concerns about FDA’s actions. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 6:02 pm
Bundra’s license on probation. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:17 pm
” ### McNicholas & McNicholas, a Los Angeles-based plaintiff-trial law firm, represents clients in the areas of catastrophic personal injury, employment law, class actions, sexual abuse, and other consumer-oriented matters such as civil rights, aviation disasters, and product liability. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 2:21 pm
Article III does not allow a plaintiff to seek to vindicate someone else's injuries. . . . [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
The majority held that the description of the plaintiffs’ expert report was sufficiently particular to survive a motion to dismiss; it also held that the plaintiffs had adequately pleaded that NVIDIA’s CEO “would have” known about supposed internal documents and that those documents “would have” reflected the same data that the plaintiffs’ expert created through after-the-fact calculations. [read post]
