Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 301 - 320
of 69,809
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 4:24 am
Magnoni v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:12 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:04 pm
The defendants have filed this consent motion seeking an extension until 21 January to file their reply to the plaintiff’s opposition to the motions to dismiss. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:05 am
The court granted defendant's motion to stay a NPE plaintiff's infringement action pending CBM review because the early stage of the case, lack of undue prejudice, and reduction of the burden of litigation weighed in favor of a stay. [read post]
9 May 2016, 7:29 am
The court granted plaintiff's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am
Scott v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 10:00 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 5:50 am
In Justice v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 4:30 am
Lias v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
In its Opinion, the court noted that the scope of the Defendant’s cross-examination of the Plaintiff’s expert doctor to show bias or interest based upon the doctor’s relationship with Plaintiff’s counsel was admissible under the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:00 am
In its Opinion, the court noted that the scope of the Defendant’s cross-examination of the Plaintiff’s expert doctor to show bias or interest based upon the doctor’s relationship with Plaintiff’s counsel was admissible under the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
Welsh, citing proportionality and privacy concerns, denied the defendant’s motion to compel the mirror imaging of the Plaintiff’s personal computers nearly three years after she had been terminated. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:13 am
In Melton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:52 am
In Vaughn v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 1:59 pm
Anderson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 11:02 am
Judge Nolan granted plaintiff’s motion to quash defendants’ subpoenas of plaintiff’s counsel – who represented: 1) plaintiffs and perhaps individual defendants in plaintiffs’ earlier trademark prosecution; and 2) plaintiffs in this case. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:21 am
In P.H. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 6:05 am
Plaintiff objected and Defendant’s filed a Motion to send the memorandum out. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 6:25 pm
But David Brannen defends the decision, explaining that the jury in the case was upset at the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
24 May 2017, 7:27 am
The court granted defendant's motion to strike the opinions of plaintiff's damages expert that defendant engaged in tax evasion and avoidance as unduly prejudicial under FRE 403. [read post]
