Search for: "Poole v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2021, 12:29 pm by Doug Cornelius
It’s really easy to create a corporation, limited liability company or limited partnership in the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:55 am by Eleanor Runde
Some are championing the idea that the United States and other G7 countries should join the Commission’s mechanism, funneling Russian state assets frozen in their own countries into a pooled investment fund. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
It calls for an 80-unit “urban living” apartment building, two 12-unit townhouse buildings with integrated parking garages, a clubhouse with common areas and a fitness room, and an outdoor pool…. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
Changes made to address similar findings on the processor issue in the CUSMA challenge were met with a sharp rebuke from the United States and a new trade challenge. [read post]
19 May 2011, 2:20 pm by Steven Boutwell
§292 to the United States government or to an entity suffering a competitive injury as a result of the alleged false marking. (10)  The America Invents Act merely narrows the potential pool of plaintiffs and does not alter the amount of damages available. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, ex rel. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 2:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Robart of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington published his FRAND rate-setting decision in the Microsoft v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am by Orin Kerr
This has gone through a few iterations, ranging from the remarks of a government official in 2007 suggesting that corporate clients of their firms might want to rethink being clients there to the efforts in 2010 to suggest that Gitmo lawyers were disloyal to the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]