Search for: "Price v. Smith" Results 301 - 320 of 958
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm by Robert E. Connolly
This has resulted in a high number of foreign executives becoming defendants in price fixing cases brought by the United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
(Daily.2016.Professors) Tristan Gray–Le Coz and Charles Duan, Apply It to the USPTO: Review of the Implementation of Alice v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
When Smith was handed down, some worried that it upset existing free exercise doctrine dating back to Sherbert v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On November 30, 2016, the Task Force on Cannabis Legalization and Regulation released their final report which contains more than 80 recommendations to governments on how to better promote and protect public health and safety, especially among young Canadians. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 5:00 am by Ian Ayres
  An analogous dynamic is described in the famous Delaware Chancery case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 7:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Which is entirely unconstitutional, says Erica Smith of the Institute for Justice, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reed v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This decision is a significant follow-on to the Delaware District Court’s recent opinion in Temple Inland, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Christopher Smith In our increasingly global economy, corporate boards are increasingly diverse, and among the diversities boards increasingly encompass are geographic and cultural diversity. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the court determined that the Jespersen dissent, which would have found that the bartender had a sex-stereotyping claim, was more in line with the post-Price Waterhouse views expressed by the Sixth Circuit, especially in Smith v. [read post]