Search for: "Price v. U.s.*"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
See Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:53 am
Circuit agreed in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:52 am
ASTM charges $56 for a copy of the standard—almost double the price of an infant bath seat. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
Live cattle futures are also impacted by cash cattle prices. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” Gunn v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Over the course of the last few months, lawyers have been deluged with articles about COVID-19 and force majeure, much of them containing quite similar content and analysis. [read post]
17 May 2020, 2:35 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 11:11 am
In Naruto v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:26 pm
In its 2012 decision, Mayo Collaborative Servs. v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
Brott v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:59 pm
Forever known as the Hatch-Waxman Act (formally, the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act), certain of the provisions created a safe harbor for generic drugs to be tested for purposes related to regulatory approval without incurring infringement liability (codified at 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:36 am
Minimum wage increase H.B. 395 and S.B. 7 increase the state minimum wage initially to $9.50 per hour and incrementally thereafter to $15.00 per hour by January 1, 2026, with continuing annual increases based on the consumer price index. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 5:25 pm
Some may argue that just as a subsidy would allow a renewable resource to bid in a lower capacity price than it otherwise would, so too might a subsidy for a fossil resource. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 7:51 am
Following hiQ v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 7:58 am
COVID-19’s impact is widespread (global), of an indeterminate duration (likely several months), and carries with it considerable uncertainty: (i) reductions to workforces due to infections and quarantines; (ii) government shelter-in-place restrictions that ban certain types of work altogether; (iii) government requisitions of supplies such as masks and other protective equipment; (iv) travel restrictions; (v) safety precautions at work sites designed to prevent the spread of… [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
Russell National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(d), 1759(a)(1)) who, if not for the closure of the school attended by the child during a public health emergency designation and due to concerns about a COVID-19 outbreak, would receive free or reduced price school meals under the Richard B. [read post]
