Search for: "Protect Our Defenders et al v. Defense et al"
Results 301 - 320
of 437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
The Borrowers asserted causes of action for malicious prosecution, fraud, and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Consumer Protection Act, and the Finance Code. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
The majority opinion reasoned that this remedy could not be distinguished from damages awarded in common law fraud cases, and therefore a jury trial in federal court was required if requested by defendants. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:55 pm
These practices are detailed in the briefs of the Alameda County Public Defenders et al. and The Bronx Defenders Union and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm
Die Bundesregierung intendiert, in der Hauptverhandlung als Drittpartei zu intervenieren. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Ginsburg et al., Fair Labor Standards Handbook, App. [read post]
6 May 2022, 4:39 pm
Shahid Akbar Abbasi v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, (Mar. 20, 2013, Nos. 11-338 and 11-347) ___ U.S. ___, 2013 U.S. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
__________________________ [1] Redish et al., supra note 2 at 644-646. [2] See e.g., Bisaillon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Our sole relist is Medina v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
In addition to increasing the burdens of securities litigation defense, bifurcation deprives defendants of the protections set out under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”). [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
In our earlier discussion, we suggested that the case of Nelson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
And it has generated some opposition especially from the criminal defense bar (e.g., here). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:54 am
The trial judge granted summary judgment for the defendants under s. 440.10. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:31 pm
As the enforcement of fundamental civil rights laws and consumer protection laws has been increasingly undermined by pre-dispute binding arbitration, a large and rapidly growing number of persons have come to see this as one of the central civil rights issues of our time. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Protecting You From Illegal Police Stops! [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
Tom King, et al (NFP) - "Although it may have been preferable to consolidate both flooding instances into one lawsuit, each flooding occurrence creates a separate cause of action. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:31 pm
The Superior Court of Stanislaus County, City of Ceres, et al. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
George Hofmeister, et al. [read post]
